EAL PAKHE

Intercalating Law as a Tool to Promote Economic Efficiency in Indonesia

By: Fajar Sugianto, Tomy Michael Saragih

134-235-2-PB

Read Full Article here:

https://arenahukum.ub.ac.id/index.php/arena/article/view/134

Indonesia as a Rechtsstaat like any other developing countries, its society is based on patterns and economic classes, overall obedience to the law is not easy. In heterogeneous society formed of groups based on religion, race, language, and wealth, it is one of the most difficult unifying factors in terms of compliance with the law. Conflict of interest tend to make any law may be resisted. As a consequence being a Rechtsstaat, the greatest difficulty is to produce efficient legal outcomes and consistency of legal practice. At this point, the law and economics offers economic efficiency as a framework to model effective legal outcome and common purposes to widely unify disparate areas of legal activities. The primacy of efficiency helps to harmonise the practice of law with social practices. When such law exists, it does function as a social tool aiming at the promotion of economic efficiency that goes well with other social practices. Efficiency in law simplifies how law works in different society, especially in heterogeneous communities. This approach does not reduce law to economics (or vice versa, for that matter), it claims simply that law and economics have a lot to learn from one another.

Artikel ini diterbitkan dalam Jurnal Arena Hukum, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2013.

Net Benefit Analysis to The Referent Group Terhadap Dampak Imunitas Hukum Aparat Penegak Hukum di Indonesia

By: Fajar Sugianto

891-2154-1-PB

Read Full Article here:

http://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/dih/article/view/891

Net Benefit Analysis (NBA) is a technique aimed at identifying the least costly way of achieving a given objective. It weights the expected benefits of choices or policy against its expected costs. The difference between the anticipated benefits and the anticipated costs is then used to choose among competing alternatives. In this writing, benefits are approximated by a willingess to pay, while costs are formalized either as a willingness to pay to avoid or, alternatively, as opportunity costs. It also shows that NBA does not require the expression of benefits and costs in money terms. The result of this analysis provides a choice among alternative means and address the preliminary question of whether the end is worth pursuing, or which among alternative goals should be pursued.

Artikel ini diterbitkan dalam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 12 No. 23, 2016.

Efisiensi dan Daya Saing Free Flow of Skilled Labour dalam Perspektif Economic Analysis of Law: Telaah Peraturan Presiden Nomor 20 Tahun 2018

By: Fajar Sugianto, Syofyan Hadi

286-999-1-PB

Read Full Article here:

https://www.rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/ejournal/index.php/jrv/article/view/286

Indonesia telah melakukan upaya-upaya mempersiapkan kebijakan serta mewujudkan regulasi khususnya tentang Tenaga Kerja Asing (TKA).Tujuan utama dari upaya-upaya ini selain turut serta dalam arus bebas tenaga kerja terampil, juga menjamin hak-hak warga Negara agar tetap mendapatkan pekerjaan dan kelayakan kehidupan. Indonesia juga berkewajiban memfasilitasi pergerakan tenaga kerja terampil. Terkait hal tersebut, pemberlakuan Perpres Nomor 20 Tahun 2018 tentang Penggunaan Tenaga Kerja Asing perlu ditelaah sejauh mana efisiensi pemberlakuan dan ketepatan substansi pengaturannya? Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah Economic Analysis of Law sebagai analisis hukum dengan menggunakan bantuan ilmu ekonomi, dalam hal ini konsep efisiensi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan masih terdapat banyak pengaturan yang inefisien dalam Peraturan Presiden ini seperti belum menekankan kepada daya saing, pencegahan kegagalan alih teknologi dan keahlian, belum mempromosikan kepentingan publik serta belum mampu mewajibkan informasi asimetris karena tidak melibatkan Tenaga Kerja Indonesia untuk memastikan kebutuhan riil penggunaan Tenaga Kerja Asing. Namun Peraturan Presiden ini sudah cukup efisien dalam hal pemangkasan birokrasi. Ke depannya, perlu dikembalikan lagi hakikat efisiensi baik dalam aspek birokrasi maupun ketepatan sasaran penggunaan TKA berdasarkan perbedaan keterampilan dan keahlian.

Artikel ini diterbitkan dalam Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2018.